Saturday, March 19, 2016

5 Stages of life...



Or 5 stages towards death.....



Stage 1: Denial (Age 0 to 16) – Life Denied the opportunity to be in pain and trouble. Life was smooth, unexperiential, naive and therefore happy :-)

Stage 2: Anger (Age 17 to 27) – Life showed all possible types of Anger - physical, psychological, emotional, environmental… It was nothing but plain betrayal…..

Stage 3: Bargaining (Age 27 to 30) – Bargaining for life, hope and happiness. It wasn't easy obviously. Intense effort, rationalizations to the extent of fooling oneself, willful suspension of truths, sweet lies…… This stage isn't permanent either.

Stage 4: Depression (Age 31 to – ) – Face the truth, break the defences, remove the mask, embrace the reality…. Result in all likelihood is loneliness and Depression/Unconditional Love.

Stage 5: Acceptance (Age – ) - Acceptance of THE truth - Mortality of everything.


In pursuit of “Unconditional Love”…..



Friendship, Love, Colleague to Colleague relationship and many other types of relationships that exists amongst human beings are conditional in nature. Or symbiotic in nature. Nothing can be entirely altruist in nature. Not even a mother child relationship (after all, the child is spreading the genes of the parents ;-))though it is the closest which appears to be unconditional in nature.

A nice take on altruism in the TV show House, MD.

(Benjamin – Patient who is very altruistic: House - A diagnostician : Park and Adams: Assistant Doctors)

(In the Clinic)

Benjamin: I started with 10 million, and I couldn't think of a reason not to give 20. Or 40. I figure I could live off $25,000 a year. One-room apartment. Bus pass, thrift stores. Bare necessities. I still have my software company. And when I make more, I'll give that way too.

(In House’s office)

Park: He's nuts.

Adams: He's generous.

Park: There's a neurological issue. He's getting rid of everything.

Adams: His echocardiogram is negative for cardiomyopathy. Head CT showed no signs of stroke or hemorrhage.

Park: He has one pair of pants.

Adams: Most people with his kind of money are commissioning oil paintings of their Yorkshire terrier. Benjamin is sacrificing his own comfort to help others.

House: That's because helping others is his Yorkie oil painting.

Adams: That's good. Not sick.

Park: That's naive and sick.


A take on conditional love in one of my favorite movie “A”. (Watch between 54:31 to 1:01:18)


So what/whom am I in Love with??

I have always struggled to love the “person” more than the “Idea of a person”. People often say they are in love with a person unconditionally meaning irrespective of what happens or changes in the person, love towards him or her remains unchanged. But in my understanding, one loves a person for certain characteristics and those can be anything, persona, attitude, money, looks etc etc etc.. Now these can continue to remain the same or change. Sometimes the change will have causes which are very reasonable and it never comes in the way of relationship. Suppose I like someone ONLY for looks and get married, I can't except the looks to remain the same after 40 yrs ;-) (Also here, my looks would have deteriorated too.. Magically if I always retained my 20's looks even after 40 yrs, how would I look at the person whom I have liked only for looks??). The same logic applies to the character of a person. We like someone else because we see somethings in them. Either those things should continue to exist for us to keep liking or if changed, the reason for change should be justifiable. Random unjustifiable changes always comes in the way of relationship and rightly so because the relationship was based on certain desirable characteristics to begin with. Also, what is a person without the characteristics which one is identified with?? It's just flesh and blood and I find it hard to be eternally in love with just flesh and blood when the persona is changing.

The above idea is not always used to judge/evaluate others. It very well applies to self. I like myself for certain characteristics which I have and certain other things which I try to posses and so work towards it. If I fall short in those, I tend to dislike myself for those shortcoming though the only difference is we tend to have much more tolerance when it comes to ourselves than others (As in the movie clip, the protagonist says “We love ourselves more than anybody else.”)

So being unconditional according to me is a state of mind in which everything (likes and dislikes) gets equalised and in that state of mind one is either a saint or dead. Living with some conditional and some unconditional relationships hasn't come to my comprehension still. Either every relationship is conditional or everything is unconditional in nature and I am in the pursuit of “Unconditional Love”.

Tuesday, March 15, 2016

“Honesty is the best policy”.. Really?




“I love you”, “You are the most amazing person I have seen”, “I think I am quite contented with the life I have” etc etc. We often hear people make such statements in different contexts. How truthful are people when they make such statements? Are they being true/honest or delusional/dishonest?

People also say things like “I want to be honest with you”, “I want to be able to tell what I actually feel like and not hide things”, “I want to follow my feel and be natural rather than artificial”. Now, these statements seem to suggest honesty and dishonesty, natural and artificial, true and false are 2 states and one can be either here or there. Let us explore the validity of this (mis)understanding.

According to me, honesty, being truthful etc etc is a spectrum and NOT 2 states where one can belong either here or there. I shall explain the rest with the help of graph.



In the above graph, honesty varies on X axis. A very dishonest person (close to 0) is an absolute hypocrite and someone who is very very honest (max on x axis) cannot be “normal” and has to have frontal lobe disinhibition (Watch House MD, “The social contract”). As one becomes more and more honest, inner peace (blue line) increases. This might be difficult to understand but imagine if one CAN speak the truth without having to maintain a web of lies, how comfortable it can get. Many times we are lonely when it comes to our thoughts because we seldom share them (mainly because we can't). We believe one thing but pretend to believe something else because what we believe might offend someone else. Also one can get labeled as crazy if he/she speaks whatever comes to mind which eventually leads to social rejection. People cannot bear to hear others' inner most unpleasant, sexual, cynical, pessimistic thoughts though they themselves will be having similar such thoughts. Everybody wants sugar coated sweet lies and therefore “Everybody lies”. As a result one can only hope to strike a balance between inner peace and social acceptance and find their own “sweet” spot. In the above graph, the point corresponding to 10 on X axis is the sweet spot where both the lines meets (a magnitude of 5.5/10 of inner peace and social acceptance). But this is no way universal. Each person has lines of different slopes and hence different sweet spots.

This graph can also help us to understand why people drink. The sober state (being inhibited) can be quite annoying at times. So we tend to drink to loosen inhibition so that we can rant out our inner thoughts. This is socially OK if others are also equally drunk but imagine drinking and ranting around people who are sober??. The comfort of speaking out inner thoughts comes with a cost of social awkwardness.

For an imaginary person with the above graph, he/she is roughly half honest, half natural, half peaceful and accepted by half the society :-). I know this is an over simplification but I hope the idea is clear.

“People often claim to hunger for truth, but seldom like the taste when it's served up.” - ― George R.R. Martin, A Clash of Kings